Tag Archives: Right to Life

Rock, Paper, Scissors: Abortion trumps Sovereignty?

In a word, yes. With so much recent legislation that has actually passed [I say sarcastically], U.S. Courts sees abortion and gay ‘marriage’ as law of the land rather than the sovereignty of the States STATED IN THE TENTH AMENDMENT IN THE CONSTITUTION:

“The judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by citizens of another state, or by citizens or subjects of any foreign state.” See that here.

Incredibly,  the simplicity of the First Amendment has been given over to a socialist group of judges that think they can parent us rather than allow us to govern ourselves CONSTITUTIONALLY.

States pass prolife laws just to have them stricken down by U.S. Judges that have no vested interest in the state in which it was passed; gay ‘marriage’ laws are forced upon people that have said NO. Gays are protected while the unborn are slaughtered constitutionally because the Constitution we know is not being enforced but altered to accept an agenda against the unborn and Christians.

OBSERVATION: Marriage, gay or not, is not mentioned in the Constitution. Recognizing gay ‘marriage’ is giving a sect of people more rights than all Americans. Then, according TO the Constitution, gay ‘marriage’ is NOT protected but RELIGIOUS FREEDOM is. The Constitution is not up for debate, it is to be upheld.

The Bill of Rights state:

  • First Amendment [Right to Religion, Speech, Press, Assembly, Petition (1791)]
  • Second Amendment [Right to Bear Arms (1791)]
  • Third Amendment [Quartering of Troops (1791)]
  • Fourth Amendment [Search and Seizure (1791)]
  • Fifth Amendment [Grand Jury, Double Jeopardy, Self-Incrimination, Due Process (1791)]
  • Sixth Amendment [Criminal Prosecutions – Jury Trial, Right to Confront and to Counsel (1791)]
  • Seventh Amendment [Common Law Suits – Jury Trial (1791)]
  • Eighth Amendment [Excess Bail or Fines, Cruel and Unusual Punishment (1791)]
  • Ninth Amendment [Non-Enumerated Rights (1791)]
  • Tenth Amendment [Rights Reserved to States or People (1791)]

In my state, a gubernatorial candidate is harassing our Governor saying he isn’t doing enough for families while this candidate supports abortion through all nine months of pregnancy. They cannot be supported if they have been ABORTED. Of course he supports gay ‘marriage’ regardless of what our State Constitution says. EACH STATE HAS A CONSTITUTION BECAUSE THE TENTH AMENDMENT GAVE US THAT RIGHT.

How far have we sunk as a ‘nation’ to allow ANYTHING to take away a state’s sovereignty to govern themselves? Then, who is making the new rules? THAT would be the Supreme Court WHO is supposed to UPHOLD the United States Constitution, not change it.

People are so judicially blind, they cannot see that we are being set up to be taken over by the federal government. There will be no need for states to have governors or legislators because laws will be settled in the White House. Soon our fought for Constitution will be nothing but kindling.

Does the Tenth Amendment trump Federal Law? It is supposed to be how a Republic is governed, by the sovereignty of the States. Pilgrims came to the New World to get away from tyranny only to build it back up to being a socialistic freight train…again. Then, Welcome to Merry Old England! And we see how that’s working for them with Islam running the country and abortion rampant. The clowns are running Piccadilly Circus.

 

All things NOT being equal…

As the Supreme Court goes, so does our original rights and liberties; then, all things being equal, the simplest solution is usually the preferred conclusion….except in government. I am not philosophical but I am interested in theories that put us where we are; after all, how can we defeat the monster if you don’t know its weaknesses and strategies?

Okham’s Razor, a philosophical kind of principle is explained: ‘A rule in science and philosophy stating that entities should not be multiplied needlessly. This rule is interpreted to mean that the simplest of two or more competing theories is preferable and that an explanation for unknown phenomena should first be attempted in terms of what is already known…….stating that in explaining something assumptions must not be needlessly multiplied – also called the principle of economy’.

‘One should proceed to simpler theories until simplicity can be traded for greater explanatory power.’ Hmm.

How dismayed the Liberal Left must be; after all, over-emphasizing and over-rationalizing and over-inflating and over-theorizing over-bloated self-appointed Progressive Democrats have made this mess and it takes the simplest thing of all to make this out of control merry-go-round to stop: 1) Don’t spend what you don’t & won’t have, 2) Stop placating women and illegals, 3) Let God back into the US instead of Islam. Okham’s Razor….it’s kind of like the ‘easy’ button. The simplest solution is always the most viable.

But, as the pulpit goes, so does the nation. Again, applying Okham’s Razor to this debacle shows that the simplicity of the Gospel and its tenets are totally ignored while embracing a psychology driven social drivel called ‘moral relativism’. And somehow we are surprised at the state our country is in.

Consequently, while the Church got murky with a social gospel, so did the American we used to know as Conservative embrace liberal socialism. Then the simplest answer to this socialist query is to bring back our basic rights and principles under the United States Constitution that was founded upon CLEAR Christian ethics, doctrine and ideology.

BUT we have a Supreme Court that continues to chip away at the Constitution while a weak-wristed pulpit takes the finished work of Jesus Christ AND the Holy Spirit out of Churches. Put that all together and you have our religious liberties such as traditional marriage and right to LIFE being taken away with much flair and fortitude.

I have to wonder, has America lost its Right to Life?