There is actual diversity; the Word English Dictionary definition says, ‘the state or quality of being different or varied’.

Theory is man-made; Truth is God-given. Man is imperfect, God is Perfect: “For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who suppress the truth in unrighteousness.” (Romans 1:18)

In other words, a woman is different than a man because we don’t have the exact same anatomy but we are both human. Now, if there were different species of human, which there is not, then the differences would be greater – much like there is different species of primates, both male and female.

Just as there is an actual diversity (difference), there is a theory of assumed diversity. An assumed diversity is when humans of the same sex assume a different identity from others of the same sex.

God made (created) men and women different from each other that they would bear children, actual diversity or difference.

REF: Word Origin and History says:

Mid-14c., “quality of being diverse,” mostly in a neutral sense, from O.Fr. diversité (12c.) “difference, diversity, unique feature, oddness:” also “wickedness, perversity,” from L. diversitatem “contrariety, contradiction, disagreement;” also, as a secondary sense, “difference, diversity” from diversus “turned different ways,” in L.L. “various,” pp. of divertere (see divert). Negative meaning, “being contrary to what is agreeable or right; perversity, evil” existed in English from late 15c. (

Man (without God) made men different from other men and women different from other women to create a separate race of humankind, theory of assumed diversity.

What God has created is pure and right, what Man creates is AGENDA (sin) which separates Man from God. That being said, the Church has taken a broad approach to a minority (about 3% of the population) created by Man to be different from God’s creation and calling it DIVERSE and ‘normal’.

To see how much of the Gay Agenda/Diverse kool-aid the Church chugs, click here for the list of D.C. area gay friendly churches. There are lists just like this in every city.

Why has the Church allowed diversity into its fold?

  • Money: The Church mimics the world to get Liberals to come back to Church; a Church that will bend to what current culture (not God) deems to be good such as being gay friendly, all roads lead to God, cult driven. This mentality brings more people to the Church because they are placated and wooed instead of being told they are SINNERS in need of a Savior.
  • More Money Cometh: If you take money from the government for your church, you do as they ‘suggest’…and they have been bought off. Money talks, even to the point of denying Christ.
  • Numbers: Even though the homosexual population is very low, their extended families and friends and sympathizers are not. Homosexuals use guilt and bullying to get their parents, children, friends and co-workers to accept their sin as ‘normal’ and decent.
  • Deception: The Church, since the beginning of time, has sought out other gods instead of the true God, YWHW. Being deceived is not an excuse, but at least a somewhat plausible one: “How then shall they call on Him in whom they have not believed? And how shall they believe in Him of whom they have not heard? And how shall they hear without a preacher?” (Romans 10:14) and “Do not be deceived: ‘Evil company corrupts good habits’,” (1Corinthians 15:33).

The true Church will not bow to the Theory of Diversity. The true Church will cause division between what is of God and what is of Man – sin cannot permeate what is perfect and God is perfect.

The Theory of Diversity is just that, a theory justified by Man only:

“And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a debased mind, to do those things which are not fitting; being filled with all unrighteousness, sexual immorality, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, evil-mindedness; they are whisperers, backbiters, haters of God, violent, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, undiscerning, untrustworthy, unloving, unforgiving, unmerciful; who, knowing the righteous judgment of God, that those who practice such things are deserving of death, not only do the same but also approve of those who practice them.” (Romans 1:28-32)

3 thoughts on “The Assumed Identity of the New Church

  1. Lines from Paul’s letters to Timothy come to mind:

    “Now the Spirit explicitly says that in the last times some will turn away from the faith by paying attention to deceitful spirits and demonic instructions through the hypocrisy of liars with branded consciences.” (1 Tim 4:1-2)


    “For the time will come when people will not tolerate sound doctrine but, following their own desires and insatiable curiosity, will accumulate teachers and will stop listening to the truth and will be diverted to myths. But you, be self-possessed in all circumstances; put up with hardship; perform the work of an evangelist; fulfill your ministry. (2 Tim 4:3-5)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s