Safe? Legal? Rare? This woman was brought into Martin Haskell’s Women’s Med Center for an abortion while in the throes of a heroin cocktail of drugs.

KEEPLIFELEGALThe current law in Ohio says [O.A.C. 3707-83-07 (A), Patient Care Policies]: “Each patient shall be allowed to refuse or withdraw consent for treatment” which obviously did not happen here. She was brought into Women’s Med in June of 2015 in a semi-conscious state and we are just now finding out what we’ve long known, that abortionists work to circumvent the law to fill their bank accounts.

She [patient] was noted for arriving with a ‘friend’ and had to lean on this person, walking slowly. The nurse’s note also stated that she was placed into a wheel chair and could not hold her own head up, her speech slow and slurred, could not keep her eyes open and twitched when they were. She was unable to hold a conversation.

Does this sound like she would be able to refuse or withdraw consent for treatment?

The ‘doctors’ note stated that she could not walk or talk or make coherent conversation. Also noted  was that the ‘friend’ who brought in the patient said she took “two Soma and several PercocetKEEPLIFELEGAL and probably both Suboxone and perhaps some heroin on her way in.” The ‘doctor’ also noted that right after the abortion, she needed to be “transferred to the hospital for further evaluation, monitoring and detoxification from the suspected drug overdose after the procedure due to her level of unconsciousness.

Does this sound like she would be able to refuse or withdraw consent for treatment?

KEEPLIFELEGALWhat is even more disturbing is that the abortionist phoned in a consultation with the backup ‘doctors’ from Wright State Physicians about proceeding with the abortion, probably trying to throw off responsibility knowing this was against the law. Essentially, the abortionist knew what they were doing on a woman that was not coherent.

Knowing this woman was overdosing, they never called an ambulance to take her to the hospital right away. This woman could have died, but rather they wanted their abortion money and continued to with this ‘procedure’ while nearly unconscious which would indicate an assault, even rape. And there is no documentation that the patient was asked whether or not she would like to withdraw consent due to her altered state.

This happened in June of 2015, we are now finding this out well over a year after it happened. I personally witnessed the first day she came, and she was clearly under the influence on that day. This was no accident, no ‘oops’ in judgement; this was a blatant abuse of the patient and the law.

Stop the Sham, abortionists are business people, not doctors. They clearly have no interest in their patients or their lives but love their bank accounts. This woman could have died from the cocktail of drugs she took that day. But not just the abortionist is at fault here, although the law puts them forefront, the person who brought the patient in KNOWING she was under the influence should have taken her straight to the emergency room. So one had to wonder what stake the friend had in the abortion to take this kind of chance with her life?

EXPOSING THE ABORTION AGENDA FROM THE PULPIT, ON THE SIDEWALK, THE MEDIA & IN THE STATEHOUSE: “Once I realized that my abortion was a tragedy and not an accomplishment, I was able to discern correctly that abortion is, indeed, MURDER.” ~ Rev. Katherine, post-abortive minister, apologist, counselor, AMERICAN.

YOU can contribute to KeepLifeLegal by simply going to the sidewalk, praying, voting for and supporting prolife candidates.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s