SCOTUS Not Impressed With Pseudo Proabort Free Speech Farce

Although, it warmed my heart to know that proaborts from Ohio traversed all the way to the Supreme Court, stood in freezing rain to get a ‘meh’ from even the liberal Justices. Just too hilarious for words…but I’ll try.
THIS is how stupid it is: Justice Anthony Kennedy also expressed doubts about the law. In one question that may prove to be pivotal in the case, he asked Farris what would happen if an unlicensed clinic wanted to put up a billboard that said only, in large letters, “Choose Life.” Would that message trigger the law’s notice requirement? Farris responded that the billboard would indeed have to disclose that the nonprofit does not provide medical services (FOR A CHOOSE LIFE SIGN????????) – a point with which Klein seemed to agree. Farris’ answer drew a sharp response from Kennedy. Requiring the inclusion of a 29-word notice on a billboard displaying a two-word message, Kennedy suggested, seems to impose an “undue burden” on the nonprofit’s speech “that should suffice to invalidate the statute.”

Every bit of this sideshow is clearly unconstitutional. Forcing anyone to go against their personal beliefs and conscience is Hitleresque, at the very least.
Justice Samuel Alito, on the other hand, was concerned that the law unfairly singles out anti-abortion facilities like crisis pregnancy centers while providing exemptions for other kinds of health-care providers. “If you have a law that’s neutral on its face” but then contains “a lot of crazy exemptions,” he asked, “isn’t it possible to infer intentional discrimination?” YES, it is intentional.
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg joined the fray. She asked Klein whether, if the state had enacted the law to address the problem of crisis pregnancy centers providing incomplete or inaccurate information. That again. Prolife pregnancy centers has never given ‘incomplete’ or wrong information to women. In fact just recently, ultrasound techs in abortion mills purposely will not show a complete image of her unborn child to ‘prove’ her child is truly a blob, see that here. That is reprehensible, that is LYING. Just because ol’ Ruth still believes life does not begin at conception does not mean she can push her abortion agenda on the rest of us. Get a CLUE.

Simply, this censorship law was passed to silence prolife centers and groups to sell more abortions. Pregnancy centers do not claim to be medical facilities, although some do have licensed technicians, nurses and physicians on the premises and/or on call. Abortion mills claim to be health centers when they CLEARLY take life, murder for money, and at times there is no physician present. In California, legislation has been passed to allow essentially anyone to perform abortion procedures. Read more about that here.

So, ultimately proaborts trying to censor prolife free speech backfired. And as well it should. Their pseudo science and twisted up logic was lost upon the Justices of the Supreme Court, and everyone else. Again.

Read the rest of the opinion here.

2016-07-21 10.46.41O

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s