Gaslighting 101: Zuck’s War of the Words

There is a war of the words plopping right onto your lap. This upcoming election is twisting words into screaming emotions. Some can’t sleep at night with worry. Some are plotting. Some are Red Bulling it to the point of emotional break. We are at WAR.

Facebook is murdering free speech, we all know that. But now out loud actively shutting down particular hashtags that reflect anything that would imply something other than far left-wing rhetoric? Facebook is forcing you to bend to their chosen words to take this election from President Trump, simply by twisting words and doctrine to suit their narrative.

None of this is a coincidence even though Facebook says it is taking more steps to encourage voting, minimize misinformation and reduce the likelihood of post-election civil unrest.” This thing initiated by Zuck is like an elementary primer of Gaslighting 101. So stinking obvious, as if we’re too stupid to see it. And Zuck’s doing this to get you too battle weary to care anymore.

Just to be clear: Anything decent, moral, conservative, Christian, the color red, is ‘misinformation’. Zuck goes on to say, “This election is not going to be business as usual. We all have a responsibility to protect our democracy.” Considering Zuck isn’t shutting down real ‘misinformation’, we call that a one-sided monopoly.

So let’s put this in prolife terms because as all prolifers know, this war on words has been going on for DECADES. And we see through it every time: Fetus. Choice. Blob of cells. Not a baby yet. Misogyny. All words to make you doubt the humanity of unborn human people. We deal with it, we oppose it, we fight it, literally every day since 1973. We are not unaware of proaborts intent to discredit and make you doubt everything you believe in.

“But we have this treasure in earthen vessels, that the excellence of the power may be of God and not of us. We are hard-pressed on every side, yet not crushed; we are perplexed, but not in despair; persecuted, but not forsaken; struck down, but not destroyed,” [2Cor4:7-11].

But we’re onto ’em. This has been going on for a long time, since the ’08 and ’12 election. Zuck has tried too hard to manipulate all of us to get a left-wing Democrat in office, but even his billions can’t stop what God has started [Acts 5:38-39].

We are battle weary and political fatigue feels like it’s going to swamp us. This war on words is not new. But with anti-social media, it’s become an Olympic event, in your face 24/7, all to get you to hate yourself enough to vote and think how Zuck wants you to.

As we’ve mentioned in previous posts, we are being shadow banned on Facebook. It’s part of the battle. We know this.

This could be the civil war Zuck and others have been begging for.

Read the Book of Acts and get ready because if this sways Zuck’s way, all we’ll have is the few things the Apostles had to keep spreading the Gospel in a social and economic tyranny of epic proportions.

BREAKING: New Facebook Terms of Service to Sacrifice YOUR Freedom of Speech

Facebook. Zuck is an anti-Constitution billionaire socialist. And just in time for the election of the millennium he makes new ‘terms‘. Interesting timing.

Like little sheep we abide by their so-called ‘standards’ or banished to the gulag in the outer reaches of the graynet. And we do it. No real pushback, just bowing to the god Zuck. We have made Facebook an idol, a type of god, that Zuck wants you to worship and never question. Zuck wants you to forego your Constitutional freedoms and Christianity.

Imagine not agreeing to FB’s terms of ‘service’. Imagine not buying ads or buying from their ads or ‘services’. Imagine a Facebook BLACKOUT to show OUR ‘terms’ of service. We are being groomed to sacrifice our freedom as Americans with something as useless and non-essential as Facebook.

As Christians, we have thrown our beliefs on the altar of Zuck, much like how the Ammonites put babies to be sacrificed on the altar of Molech. 

As conservatives, we skirt the ‘terms of service’ (service…what a joke) to stay out of the outer reaches of the gulag. It’s almost a rite of passage to get that banishment from the Facebook overlords. 

As prolifers, we are shadowbanned and shut down while FB allows deathscorts to bully and intimidate and terrorize true peaceful protesters. They use filthy hate mongering rhetoric, always doxing prolifers, gaslighting truth, all with the permission of Zuck. 

But what do we sacrifice to stay in Zuck’s good graces? And never mind about our own sensibilities. All we do is tell the truth and get splayed on the Facebook Altar of Sacrifice. What is the cost? Our voices and opinions are shut down to oblige the many minions of Zuck who seem to be offended with anything decent and good and Godly.  

Facebook HATES Christians and God.
Facebook HATES Republicans and Conservatives.
Facebook HATES President Trump.

Facebook LOVES domestic terrorists. They placate and bow down BLM and Antifa. They court fake ‘peaceful protesting’ that looks like terrorism and rioting. 

All at the cost of your First Amendment Rights as Americans.

Then the question is WHY isn’t anyone really doing anything about this? Facebook has been altering YOUR THINKING for Democrat outcomes for years. They have paid to play to get the candidate Zuck thinks YOU should have that will run our country right in to the ground. 

But I could opine about the irony of it all. Wealthy socialists tell us how wrong we are but never give up a dime to help anyone in real need or distribute their wealth like they want to force you to do. Look at the aftermath of Hurricane Laura, has Zuck or Bezos or Gates or BLM or Antifa shown up to tangibly help one person? AT ALL? 

It’s time to tear down the high places, the altar of Baal…I mean, Facebook.

Deut 12:1-4

Bible Study: Inaction of the New Passive Aggressive Prolife Movement, Part 2

We are continuing our Bible Study regarding Biblical prolife ministry and rescues. Click here and here to read the previous posts. This study continues to answer the question of prolife rescues and outreaches are biblical.

Today, we go to the Book of Galatians, and we see in Paul’s letter to the Galatians that they have departed from the faith and has gone back to a works based religion rather than Faith in the Finished Work of Christ. Very much like the ‘New Prolife Movement’, they have left their first love and decided to be as God rather than putting their faith in Him only.

We ask the question, again, are prolife outreaches and rescuing biblical – YES: “…who gave Himself for our sins that He might DELIVER us from this present evil age, according tot he will of our God and Father, to whom be the glory forever and ever. Amen,” (Gal 1:4-5). Using Strong’s Concordance, the word ‘deliver’ in the Greek is ‘exaireo‘ (to rescue,GK1807rescue deliver – properly, to cause to be rescued), emphasizes total removal (“wholly out from”). This refers to a complete rescue, bringing a person into full deliverance.

So, when Christ ‘delivered us’, He RESCUED us from a burning hell, from a sinful life, out of the hand of the devil himself.

But this is just the tip of the new passive aggressive prolife movement iceberg, one that is trying to drain the ocean to sink the ship of a real and active prolife movement, preaching another gospel, which is no Gospel at all. Their message is secular and arrogant, has no ‘meat’, and definitely no Jesus.

“I marvel that you are turning away so soon from Him who called you in the grace of Christ, to a different gospel, which is not another; but there are some who trouble you and want to pervert the gospel of Christ,” (Gal 1:6-7).

The real prolife message has been perverted by this new passive aggressive prolife movement, a ‘new’ gospel that has nothing to offer. But even worse, the ‘new and improved’ prolife movement is lying to you, taking your money, bringing a secular message to the lost and dying. DO NOT BELIEVE that inaction is action just because the new passive aggressive prolife movement says so.

Rescues are biblical. Rescues show the hand of God extended to those who cannot speak for themselves, vote, or even have an opinion. Rescues are the Church in ACTION. The unborn relies on the Church, not the Abbys and Laurens, to have the right to life TODAY.

A Political Conversation

A POLITICAL CONVERSATIONby Jeremiah Johnson Ministries

Is it unreasonable to ask Christians to simply vote for the candidate they feel best represents biblical values?

I openly confess that I have NEVER understood the wars surrounding politics. Here is my process:

Every election year, I blot out Democrat or Republican and I also blot out the candidates names. I then check whatever boxes best represent biblical values.

✅ Pro Life
✅ Pro Israel
✅ Pro Religious Liberty

And on and on…

Image may contain: 2 people

The candidate and party that has the most checked boxes is who I vote for. Period. White, black, hispanic, male, female, etc. If any Democrat or any other party had the most checked boxes, I would vote for them in a heartbeat. Period.

For example, in the 2016 Florida Primaries, I voted for Tedd Cruz over Donald Trump. Why? Because I believed he more rightly represented biblical values.

In November when the election became Donald Trump versus Hillary Clinton, I again, blotted out the political parties and names and simply checked the boxes. I then had no other option but to vote for Trump.

When Christians start bashing Joe Biden or Donald Trump for their demeanor, competency, decisions etc, I personally do not understand. Put the men and political parties aside and just check boxes based off biblical values. Why is this so hard?

I look at the 2020 election and don’t even begin to understand what the debate is among Christians as to who to vote for. Without tearing down either man, can we just look at the Bible to determine our vote? Can someone help me understand what I’m missing?

Jeremiah Johnson

Should Christians Get Involved in Politics?

by Pastor Bob Cornell of Cornell Ministries

With the November 3rd presidential election quickly coming upon us, the question given in the title of this article has been stirring in my spirit. The majority of those who identify themselves as evangelical (gospel believing) Christians in the USA, no matter what race, believe in the voting process. But yet there is a large portion of Christianity that does not vote, even if they would verbally ascribe to it. The arguments against believers getting involved in politics are such as, “The Bible does not state clearly that we should involve ourselves in secular politics or voting,” or “The church is not called to vote, we are called to preach the gospel,” or “Christians are ONLY to pray for, honor, and obey governmental leaders and civil authorities, along with paying taxes”Image may contain: 2 people, people smiling, people standing, sky, beard and outdoor (Rom. 13:1-7; 1 Tim. 2:1-4; 2 Pet. 3:13-17). It is true that there are no verses in the Bible that state specifically “Thou shall vote” or “Thou shall strive to become governmental leaders.” To some, it seems clear that Christians should not involve themselves in politics at all or just in the realm of voting and that’s it. To others, the whole Bible should be considered and not just those passages that specifically mention governmental leaders and the church. The following is just a few examples of what the Bible states about believers and politics.

First of all, it should be understood what is meant by the word “politics.” The English word “politics” comes from the Greek word for “city”, polis, and “citizen”, polites. Politics and being a citizen are closely connected. Politics is the art of managing or influencing government policies. Being a citizen is one who has the right to be a member of the social politic (management and influence) of a country. In other words, citizens are the ones who manage, influence, and use the rights of the politics of a country. Of course, in a cruel dictatorship or communism, the role of a citizen in politics is different.

In Acts 22:25-29 Paul used his Roman citizenship for the advancement of God’s will for his life, and ultimately for the Gospel’s sake. The Jewish Sanhedrin was demanding that the Roman authorities scourge Paul which would have most possibly ended Paul’s life. But Paul used his rights as a Roman citizen to stop it. Paul said to the centurion “Is it lawful for you to scourge a man who is a Roman, and uncondemned?” (vs. 25). All of Acts 25 is about Paul’s continual appeal before Roman authorities to Roman law. In vs. 11 he even said “I appeal to Caesar.” Paul knew that it was God’s will for him to go to Rome. He also realized the only way that was possible was for him to use politics as a citizen of Rome. He would eventually be martyred by Nero, the Roman Emperor, but before that happened he wrote the “prison epistles,” and saw many Roman soldiers and common people won to Christ in Rome. Rome did not have a voting system like we do in the USA, but his appeal to Caesar was essentially his “vote” to use his rights as a Roman citizen. His “vote” would eventually end his life, but it also influenced the world from that point in time to the present. In Phil. 3:20 Paul wrote that “our citizenship is in heaven…” As children of God, we have dual citizenship, in heaven and on earth.

What do we take away from this example God gave us through Paul? A book could be written, but here are three important points:

1. Use our rights as a citizen to spread the Gospel to as many people as we can.
•We have the freedom & rights in the USA to spread the Gospel, so use that freedom & rights for the glory of God.
2. Use all the freedoms given to us as citizens to influence society with the Gospel and biblical morality & righteousness.
•Paul’s life is a snapshot of this. When he preached the Gospel in Jewish synagogues, he did so because he showed up and would have been invited by the ruling rabbi of that synagogue. We need to use our rights to at least show up to give the Gospel, even at places where we know we’ll be rejected.
•The Gospel brought God’s righteousness and morality everywhere Paul preached it. It does the same today in our society.
3. Paul used the rights given to him, so as citizens of the USA, we have the right and responsibility to use our vote to vote in leaders that will allow the church to continue to spread the Gospel freely.

We have several examples in the Old Testament in which God placed His people in influential positions in secular governments. It was God’s will for Joseph to be second in command to Pharaoh in Egypt in order to provide for and protect his family (Gen. 41:37-57). God placed Daniel, Shadrach, Meshach, and Abed-nego in very influential positions in Babylon (Dan. 1-4). Nebuchadnezzar, the evil king of Babylon, had a life changing experience and he gave his life to God (Dan. 4). Daniel eventually was second in command to Darius in the Persian government in Daniel 6. He was a prophet and politician in a secular government. Esther became the queen of Persia in order to keep the Jewish people alive. God even used Cyrus, the heathen king of Persia, to provide for God’s people to rebuild the temple (Ezra 4:5). God used Cyrus so much that He even referred to Cyrus as His “anointed (one)” in Isaiah 45:1.

What do we take away from these examples?

1. At times, God will place a calling on a believer to be a political leader in some capacity.
•This does not mean that God has called the church to take over secular society through politics. This does mean that God can and will call His people to be in governmental positions, ultimately to uphold or be an example of biblical righteousness and morality in the country.
2. At times, God will even use unsaved governmental leaders for His purpose and glory.

Pastor Bob Cornell of Cornell Ministries

If you were blessed by Pastor Bob’s post, please consider giving here