The God-INTENDED Feminist, Part 2

Being an ordained minister, I know what a God-intended feminist is, there are so many great women to list in this post. The first obvious God-intended feminist is the Prophetess Deborah who was a leader well before there were suffragettes. The next one that comes 2016-07-21 10.46.41ato mind is Esther, she literally put her life on the line to free her people. This is probably my favorite, Bathsheba. She was an adulterer, repentant, and became the mother of Solomon. Even more notably, The Proverbs 31 Woman. I love her best because she really made a mess of her life, cleaned it up, and through God’s Grace became the benchmark that every woman should aspire to be. And that’s just in the Old Testament.

So when I see the ‘new’ feminism, especially in the prolife movement, as a Christian and minister I am offended that any woman would label themselves a ‘new’ feminist. Never has a so-called movement been so clearly not of God, nor of polite society.

Feminism was not meant to be ugly and mean, but here we are. And the prolife movement is no exception to this ugliness. This ‘new’ feminism is very interesting to me, but even more so are the splinter groups that have formed, both prolife and proabort sides. Just to make this clear, I am NOT surprised that progressive feminists are evil and vile. It’s obvious, kind of like daring people to cross them, or whatever. I find it very cartoony and simple, obnoxious and funny. These ‘women’ really believe they speak for all women.

What is more disturbing and reprehensible are the faux-life feminists. I mean seriously. What really separates them from proaborts? Because if I saw them side by side, I’d have a pretty rough time seeing or hearing the difference, and not because of their appearance, but because of their shaming, shunning, filthy language, lack of sensibilities and basic manners.

The capability to be in polite society should set us apart from the animals, but how would anyone know the difference? My way or the highway, throw friends under the bus, cop a lousy attitude.

Then, what happened to the God-intended feminists? Why is the faux-life movement so offended at the real things of God? Why are prolife Christian women judged as being extreme? To that, I say THANK YOU FOR NOTICING. Being set apart for such a time as this is called MINISTRY. Much like the OT and NT God-intended feminists, I trust God, not feminism, to do what God has called me to do, a task taken seriously without apology.

But why are the ‘new’ feminists so mean to the God-intended feminists? Maybe being a Trump Conservative was just too much to deal with. Are we too old to be ‘relevant’? That’s ageism. No preaching on the sidewalk? That’s persecution. No graphic imagery? That’s not telling the whole truth.

Look, it’s real easy to be the popular one when you go out of your way to look and sound the part. But when you refuse to set yourself apart from the opposition, all you’ve done is a whole bunch of nothing, causing confusion, being part of the problem. And that’s too bad. There is so much more for you.

“And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.” [Romans 12:2]

 

Advertisements

Bogus Arrest of Prolifer Going to Jury, Significant Monetary Damages Likely

LOVE IT when proaborts makes our lives easier. First, they try to silence us…NOPE. Second, they try to get us arrested exercising our FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS on the public right-of-way….NOPE. Third, and my personal favorite, is when proaborts LIE OUT LOUD to the police and 911 operators…NOPE. You all just got found out, and it’ll cost ya.

“Unbeknownst to Thames, a Northland employee and the security guard called 9112016-11-10-13-53-40 and made a false claim that Thames was threatening to bomb the Northland facility………Based solely on the absurd and false accusation of the security guard, the police arrested Thames, who then spent 49 hours in the City jail until a detective finally released her after reading the report and concluding, “I do not see a direct threat where Kimberly threatened to bomb the clinic.”

The Judge’s ruling continued: “Based on this record, there is a genuine issue of material fact as to whether Officers Gatti and Sergeant Brooks arrested Thames for her prolife activity, and not because she made a ‘true threat’.  Significantly, Defendants failed to evacuate the abortion clinic or make any meaningful attempt to locate a bomb……Just as with Thames’ First Amendment retaliatory arrest claim, the law was clearly established that the police could not arrest a peaceful speaker engaged in protected speech on a public sidewalk…….Accordingly, the arresting officers are not entitled to qualified immunity on Thames’ equal protection claim.”

“The judge’s ruling is significant in at least two respects.  First, our client’s meritorious case is now heading to a jury, which will allow us to seek significant monetary damages for the pain and suffering these officers inflicted.  And second, the judge’s ruling establishes important legal precedent for future pro-life cases.  Too often these cases are dismissed because the court finds that the arresting officers are entitled to qualified immunity.  Here, to deny the officers this defense, the judge had to conclude that the officers are liable for violating clearly established rights of which a reasonable person would have known, which he did, thereby sending the case to a jury.” (American Freedom Law Center)

Read the rest here.

BREAKING: John Oliver vs. CPC’s Prove Proaborts are LOSING

While proaborts believe prolifers are on the arduous uphill battle, so-called comedians like John Oliver is their death knell. Proaborts are suffering the defeat, and they are going down in an inglorious inferno. Thanks, John! It truly helps when you make our point of proabort logic being a kind of insanity.

CPCdeniers

First, John Oliver is a pig of a man. Period. He is no ‘man’, instead he’s just another ill-informed proabort that makes money from making people laugh about killing unborn babies. But, here he is AGAIN, finding humor in crisis pregnancy centers and pregnancy resource centers. But let a nitwit with a filthy mouth tell you how wrong it is for people to save lives. His latest video literally SHAMES proaborts with their bull rhetoric of prolifers and so-called ‘conspiracy’ against abortion mills. Abortion ‘clinics’ seal their own fate, knowing full well they kill unborn people for money.

CPC’s and PRC’s are no conspiracy, although Oliver’s argument is strengthened when he quoted Abby Johnson. And of course, Johnson literally made his point. Nice going. Too bad Oliver didn’t use a real life prolifer, but wasn’t that the point?

In the video, I will say that ol’ Abby Johnson did throw a wrench into the mix by fueling their hate fire with gasoline saying CPC’s need to look ‘neutral’, like an abortion ‘clinic’, to lure abortion minded women into centers. Thanks, Abby. Seriously. Once again your ‘new age prolife’ garbage to sit back and mind bend people with neutrality is embarrassing for the rest of us TELLING THE TRUTH.

CPC’s and PRC’s do not have to ‘lure’ anyone, they don’t lie, they show the truth that abortion KILLS and it can’t be undone.

BUT WAIT!!! There’s more: Truth telling resource centers want to help with parenting classes, baby furniture, clothes, diapers, food, etc. Imagine, CPC’s and PRC’s helping an entire family to love and take care of their infant…THE HORROR!!!! But thanks to the ‘new age prolifers’, we get blow back from proaborts. Who knows how many unborn children may have died as a result of this.

To summarize this…idiocy…the video speaks for itself that proaborts of all types make baby killing a sport and joked about like some kind of sick sideshow. And it also tells us that perhaps the ‘new age prolifer’ needs to change gears and actually TELL THE TRUTH: “My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge,” (Hosea 4:6).

 

Faux-Life Sheeple vs. Civil Rights Interposition

PROLIFER SHAMING.MLKblmSitIns
RESCUING.
INTERPOSITION?

Who’s right? Who’s wrong?

I would say, as I’m sure you can SEE in the photo provided, that intervening on another person’s behalf – who is seemingly POWERLESS – for their civil right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness is POWERFUL, BIBLICAL, & CORRECT.  I would also say GOOD THING that people DID interpose on behalf of people to ensure their civil rights even when others SHAMED THEM PUBLICLY.

Imagine if there was no interposition, no real rescue, of persons who were hated for no real reason other than the color of their skin.

When innocent people are in danger or persecuted, or perhaps hated for no reason, do you shame their rescuers? When innocent people are about to be killed for no other reason than their religion, do you shame their rescuers?

This same interposition dynamic that prompted the civil rights movement is the same exact persecution that PROABORT LAW has STOPPED for the unborn. Black Lives Matter (et al) is PROTECTED to literally stop freeway traffic for hours and to pillage, which brings about lawlessness that broke many other laws. But think about how FEW people were arrested or tried for having interposed because of their beliefs, and may not have saved one life for it. Was it necessary for BLM to do their lawless deeds? If you say YES, then you have to agree that the particular dynamic used should be available to all.

The law did not stop the civil rights movement, then why should it stop the rescue movement? Both movements believe civil rights to be Constitutional – only one is PROTECTED. In order to repeal FACE, abortion has to be shown for what it actually is rather than pseudo ‘healthcare’. Rescuers do not impede a person’s healthcare, rescuers save lives.

But I ask you this: When an innocent child – who has no voice other than their heartbeat – is about to be killed, DO YOU SHAME THEIR RESCUERS???

My dear faux-life sheeple and their leaders: If you prefer to not rescue, THEN DON’T RESCUE. It isn’t for everyone, although it should be. But, rather than SHAME people for saving lives, lift them up in prayer for having the fortitude to do the very hard thing, sacrificing ALL, to save even just one unborn child.

Yes, we should preach. PREACH PREACH PREACH on the sidewalk when moms are about to kill their child. Moms need to KNOW that their child has been known since the very foundations of the world by God and that their sin can be forgiven if they REPENT.

Yes, we should use graphic imagery. Not giving the moms the ENTIRE truth is LYING.

Yes, we should always love. Changing their hearts NOW may saves lives of other children later. One seed planted is a forest is grown.

“Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ, who gave Himself for our sins so that He might RESCUE us from this present evil age, according to the will of our God and Father,[Gal 1:3-4, NASB]

Spinning the Abortion Fable, or Who Hid the Due Process?

Abortion is a fable without a moral outcome. Prolife – life at conception – is science, truth, and without agenda. Abortion is nothing but secular agenda which can only benefit the agenda, not the mother or child. 2016-11-10-13-53-40

Wish I could take credit for this bit of TRUTH: “Being pro choice is not refraining from imposing your judgment on others. It is allowing a death sentence to be imposed on an innocent human being without any semblance of due process.”

You would think – as a moral, secular, social justice pink hat wearing minion – that DUE PROCESS would appeal to you, much like how you lean hard on the ACLU (et al) to force fit your agenda into society. But, alas, it cannot, when it does not benefit YOU. Then, who exactly does DUE PROCESS benefit?

Definition of due process

1 a course of formal proceedings (such as legal proceedings) carried out regularly and in accordance with established rules and principles  called also procedural due process
2:  a judicial requirement that enacted laws may not contain provisions that result in the unfair, arbitrary, or unreasonable treatment of an individual  called also substantive due process.

The 14th Amendment of the Constitution says: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAWnor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

Then, my dear misanthropist, where does it say anywhere that ONLY YOU get due process? Anyone?

Interestingly, if a proabort actually allows a ‘wanted’ pregnancy, it should be considered that even their own ‘wanted’ child has no hope for any of his/her own due process, basic human rights, or 100% chance of being BORN. If in fact proaborts hold their own truths to be ‘self evident’, then they have to give ALL unborn children the exact same DUE PROCESS and scrutiny.

Dear death loving proabort: Due Process. If, in fact, you are all about justice for everyone, remember who you throw under the bus for your convenience and enjoyment. If you do not, then you are a LIAR.

KEEPLIFELEGAL
Proabort Logic, because p*ssy power is more important than unborn human life.