Faux-Life Sheeple vs. Civil Rights Interposition

PROLIFER SHAMING.MLKblmSitIns
RESCUING.
INTERPOSITION?

Who’s right? Who’s wrong?

I would say, as I’m sure you can SEE in the photo provided, that intervening on another person’s behalf – who is seemingly POWERLESS – for their civil right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness is POWERFUL, BIBLICAL, & CORRECT.  I would also say GOOD THING that people DID interpose on behalf of people to ensure their civil rights even when others SHAMED THEM PUBLICLY.

Imagine if there was no interposition, no real rescue, of persons who were hated for no real reason other than the color of their skin.

When innocent people are in danger or persecuted, or perhaps hated for no reason, do you shame their rescuers? When innocent people are about to be killed for no other reason than their religion, do you shame their rescuers?

This same interposition dynamic that prompted the civil rights movement is the same exact persecution that PROABORT LAW has STOPPED for the unborn. Black Lives Matter (et al) is PROTECTED to literally stop freeway traffic for hours and to pillage, which brings about lawlessness that broke many other laws. But think about how FEW people were arrested or tried for having interposed because of their beliefs, and may not have saved one life for it. Was it necessary for BLM to do their lawless deeds? If you say YES, then you have to agree that the particular dynamic used should be available to all.

The law did not stop the civil rights movement, then why should it stop the rescue movement? Both movements believe civil rights to be Constitutional – only one is PROTECTED. In order to repeal FACE, abortion has to be shown for what it actually is rather than pseudo ‘healthcare’. Rescuers do not impede a person’s healthcare, rescuers save lives.

But I ask you this: When an innocent child – who has no voice other than their heartbeat – is about to be killed, DO YOU SHAME THEIR RESCUERS???

My dear faux-life sheeple and their leaders: If you prefer to not rescue, THEN DON’T RESCUE. It isn’t for everyone, although it should be. But, rather than SHAME people for saving lives, lift them up in prayer for having the fortitude to do the very hard thing, sacrificing ALL, to save even just one unborn child.

Yes, we should preach. PREACH PREACH PREACH on the sidewalk when moms are about to kill their child. Moms need to KNOW that their child has been known since the very foundations of the world by God and that their sin can be forgiven if they REPENT.

Yes, we should use graphic imagery. Not giving the moms the ENTIRE truth is LYING.

Yes, we should always love. Changing their hearts NOW may saves lives of other children later. One seed planted is a forest is grown.

“Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ, who gave Himself for our sins so that He might RESCUE us from this present evil age, according to the will of our God and Father,[Gal 1:3-4, NASB]

Advertisements

Spinning the Abortion Fable, or Who Hid the Due Process?

Abortion is a fable without a moral outcome. Prolife – life at conception – is science, truth, and without agenda. Abortion is nothing but secular agenda which can only benefit the agenda, not the mother or child. 2016-11-10-13-53-40

Wish I could take credit for this bit of TRUTH: “Being pro choice is not refraining from imposing your judgment on others. It is allowing a death sentence to be imposed on an innocent human being without any semblance of due process.”

You would think – as a moral, secular, social justice pink hat wearing minion – that DUE PROCESS would appeal to you, much like how you lean hard on the ACLU (et al) to force fit your agenda into society. But, alas, it cannot, when it does not benefit YOU. Then, who exactly does DUE PROCESS benefit?

Definition of due process

1 a course of formal proceedings (such as legal proceedings) carried out regularly and in accordance with established rules and principles  called also procedural due process
2:  a judicial requirement that enacted laws may not contain provisions that result in the unfair, arbitrary, or unreasonable treatment of an individual  called also substantive due process.

The 14th Amendment of the Constitution says: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAWnor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

Then, my dear misanthropist, where does it say anywhere that ONLY YOU get due process? Anyone?

Interestingly, if a proabort actually allows a ‘wanted’ pregnancy, it should be considered that even their own ‘wanted’ child has no hope for any of his/her own due process, basic human rights, or 100% chance of being BORN. If in fact proaborts hold their own truths to be ‘self evident’, then they have to give ALL unborn children the exact same DUE PROCESS and scrutiny.

Dear death loving proabort: Due Process. If, in fact, you are all about justice for everyone, remember who you throw under the bus for your convenience and enjoyment. If you do not, then you are a LIAR.

KEEPLIFELEGAL
Proabort Logic, because p*ssy power is more important than unborn human life.

The Aged Whine of Ohio Proaborts – ‘Gerrymandering’.

It’s real easy to call foul when YOU’RE LOSING. So typical of proaborts expecting to spend a bunch of YOUR TAX MONEY to redistrict the state of Ohio to give them the majority. Sadly, their empty pockets and loss of credibility will bring about YET another failure.

“The people in the Legislature, for the most part, they don’t look like the population, they don’t think like the population,” Kellie Copeland of NARAL Proabort Ohio said. 

2013-07-17-18-30-13.jpgLITERALLY don’t have enough days in the week to tell this person and her trusty minions just how wrong they are. NARAL Proabort Ohio has the nerve to whine about being taken seriously in regard to so-called ‘gerrymandering’. NARAL Proabort Ohio’s podcast sole purpose is to mispronounce prolifers names and ridicule their appearance, laugh like rabid hyenas at middle school humor, but want to be taken so seriously when they take your tax money to appeal settled prolife laws. Read that here.

Ohio is a constant pile of manure to proborts; they wallow in it, they fling it at prolife Ohioans, has gone nose blind to the disgusting odor, attracting the proabort flies that buzz around it all. So, when you read about how misdirected or lopsided or aggressive prolife legislators are, remember that pile of crap they call ‘choice’ and how they lie to get it.

Since the redistricting, the everlasting whine of the Ohio proabort has been just glorious! I find it interesting that if the cards were stacked in their favor, nary a peep would you hear from them. Hypocrites.

Ms. Copeland doesn’t quite understand how state politics works. People VOTE for the people who most represents THEM. So, the ‘they don’t look or think like the population’ is just plain ignorance at the obvious. WHY would anyone vote for the complete opposite of who they are? Exactly.

KEEPLIFELEGALIn Ohio, MOST counties voted Red in the last elections. The only counties that did not is where the progressive liberal democrats reside. In Ohio, that would be in the major cites (Cincinnati, Toledo, Cleveland, Columbus, Dayton), much like most states. Then WHY should only the major cities of any state dictate the rest of the state? OBVIOUSLY it should not, which is why there is an electoral college for federal elections, you know, checks and balances. The districts in Ohio are fair and balanced as the SCOTUS dictates.

This so-called ‘gerrymandering’ is the brain child of all democrats who lost this past election. If they are seeing ‘red’ in their districts, then perhaps they should reconsider their extreme left agenda, it does not work anymore.

What else do you expect from Trump haters: “Republicans hold 24 seats in the 33-seat Senate and 66 in the 99-member House. The party first claimed a supermajority in 2012, but the bigger shift came in 2010, when the Democrats lost a whopping 13 seats in the House, handing control of the chamber to Republicans in the crucial election before the state maps would be redrawn.” Read the rest here.

Well, I’ll be darned. Won fair and square, we did.

Then, the real question is why do proaborts care about redistricting: “extreme anti-abortion legislation”. To translate, ABORTION has been losing it’s evil baby killing footing in Ohio for years. Great legislation has been passed to protect unborn Ohioans from murderous proabort agenda.

The only thing that’s gerrymandered around here in Ohio is the deadbeat proaborts that waste our tax money to get their baby killing majority back. Good luck with that. Pretty sure we’re onto ya.

March for Our Lives? HARDLY.

And here’s why. The ‘March for Our Lives’ is a total swipe to the actual March for Life in DC every January. While prolifers march for all lives, this JOKE is marching for just a particular few. Can’t you smell the agenda?

march4ourlivesThe organizers for this national grandstand is the socialist Women’s March and Planned Parenthood. Which, if I have to tell you how INSANE it is that the number one CHILD KILLER in America is sponsoring anything to do with saving kids lives??? REALLY???

The liberal activist group MoveOn, as well as Planned Parenthood actively support the march. Planned Parenthood lists 14 local marches on its website. If you are wondering why an organization dedicated to ending the lives of children, is marching in support of a movement to end violence towards children, you are not alone. Read the rest here.

Over 850 ‘sibling marches’ are also scheduled…seemingly by students only. Sure they are. The major funder is Michael Bloomberg from ‘Every Town for Gun Safety‘ and will spend what’s left on lobbying on gun issues. See the video here.

March For Our Lives Action Fund, as a 501(c)(4) organization, will not be required to disclose its donors, and individuals who send cash to the group can remain anonymous. A 501(c)(4) designated group can be involved in political activity as long as it does not become its primary focus. The organization said on its website it chose to incorporate the group this way because it plans to lobby for new gun-control legislation even after Saturday’s march. Read the rest here.

This is a massive push for voter registration, period. The hatred for President Trump is a breeder for this insanity to take away our guns and rights. Do not be deceived, these fresh faced kids want to take away your rights. Period. But I have to wonder if they would march for unborn kids whose lives are much more likely to end in violence than their own.

Today, over 4000 children were murdered. No march.

LouivilleDeathScorts

SCOTUS Not Impressed With Pseudo Proabort Free Speech Farce

Although, it warmed my heart to know that proaborts from Ohio traversed all the way to the Supreme Court, stood in freezing rain to get a ‘meh’ from even the liberal Justices. Just too hilarious for words…but I’ll try.
THIS is how stupid it is: Justice Anthony Kennedy also expressed doubts about the law. In one question that may prove to be pivotal in the case, he asked Farris what would happen if an unlicensed clinic wanted to put up a billboard that said only, in large letters, “Choose Life.” Would that message trigger the law’s notice requirement? Farris responded that the billboard would indeed have to disclose that the nonprofit does not provide medical services (FOR A CHOOSE LIFE SIGN????????) – a point with which Klein seemed to agree. Farris’ answer drew a sharp response from Kennedy. Requiring the inclusion of a 29-word notice on a billboard displaying a two-word message, Kennedy suggested, seems to impose an “undue burden” on the nonprofit’s speech “that should suffice to invalidate the statute.”

Every bit of this sideshow is clearly unconstitutional. Forcing anyone to go against their personal beliefs and conscience is Hitleresque, at the very least.
Justice Samuel Alito, on the other hand, was concerned that the law unfairly singles out anti-abortion facilities like crisis pregnancy centers while providing exemptions for other kinds of health-care providers. “If you have a law that’s neutral on its face” but then contains “a lot of crazy exemptions,” he asked, “isn’t it possible to infer intentional discrimination?” YES, it is intentional.
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg joined the fray. She asked Klein whether, if the state had enacted the law to address the problem of crisis pregnancy centers providing incomplete or inaccurate information. That again. Prolife pregnancy centers has never given ‘incomplete’ or wrong information to women. In fact just recently, ultrasound techs in abortion mills purposely will not show a complete image of her unborn child to ‘prove’ her child is truly a blob, see that here. That is reprehensible, that is LYING. Just because ol’ Ruth still believes life does not begin at conception does not mean she can push her abortion agenda on the rest of us. Get a CLUE.

Simply, this censorship law was passed to silence prolife centers and groups to sell more abortions. Pregnancy centers do not claim to be medical facilities, although some do have licensed technicians, nurses and physicians on the premises and/or on call. Abortion mills claim to be health centers when they CLEARLY take life, murder for money, and at times there is no physician present. In California, legislation has been passed to allow essentially anyone to perform abortion procedures. Read more about that here.

So, ultimately proaborts trying to censor prolife free speech backfired. And as well it should. Their pseudo science and twisted up logic was lost upon the Justices of the Supreme Court, and everyone else. Again.

Read the rest of the opinion here.

2016-07-21 10.46.41O