Wall Street is TRADING Water, and What You Can Expect.

You’ll pay for it, that’s for sure. And way more than you are now. But who owns publicly traded freshwater? This will be like Total Recall, selling fresh air on Mars, except it’s really happening. Humans need air, water and food to survive. And we suspect the middle class will be targeted.

Fresh water is now a traded commodity: In order to trade for it, someone has to own it. So, who owns freshwater? See the NYSE WAT here.

It was said that 2/3 of the WORLD is expected to have fresh water shortages. TWO THIRDS. Bill Gates has been buying up extreme amounts of FARMLAND, and much of it in the Great Lakes region. Farms typically have a lot of groundwater or use natural streams/creeks/rivers/lakes/ponds to sustain the land/crops/animals. Is Bill Gates buying up farmland for water futures?

WHO OWNS PUBLICLY TRADED WATER? And where is it? Is it the Mississippi River? Lake Michigan? WHERE? Water evaporates. Figure that out.

Side note: If you have your own well on your own land, make sure that you actually OWN what is underground. When big coal money came to West Virginia and Kentucky decades ago, poor Appalachian people signed off on selling what they owned UNDER ground for mineral rights to ultra rich mining companies.

Probably every manufactured product uses water during some part of the production process. Industrial water use includes water used for such purposes as fabricating, processing, washing, diluting, cooling, or transporting a product; incorporating water into a product; or for sanitation needs within the manufacturing facility. Some industries that use large amounts of water produce such commodities as food, paper, chemicals, refined petroleum, or primary metals,” according to USGS.gov. SO IS FRACKING. Is Bill getting soft on natural gas?

The Gates family’s biggest holdings are in Louisiana (69,071 acres), Arkansas (47,927 acres), and Nebraska (20,588 acres), the report said. Their farmland is held both directly and through Cascade Investment, a firm controlled by Gates to manage his investments, according to The Land Report. [Business Insider]

What we do know is that the PRICE of WATER will go up. And OF COURSE Bill’s climate change money maker baby is to blame. Bill is one of Biden’s handlers, so it is pretty safe to assume that this will get worse. So while public land can have a lot of red tape to get to the natural resources, private land has much less. Your water bill will go up, we will be forced to ‘save’ water, and I’d be willing to bet it all that there will be the most forceful and horrific droughts in human history happening in the near future. Because, you know, climate change…not Wall Street risks.

Across the business world hedge funds have expressed plans to invest heavily in water, as well as any ancillary water-related commodities and products. RBC Capital Markets analyst Deandra Marlin outlined to investors, “Despite water being a fundamental human necessity, we believe people must pay a fair market price for it, just the same way that we at RBC Capital should be able to buy and sell other things that are mostly comprised of water, and then maybe even sell those hypothetical water-based items to work for pennies on the dollar in an Amazon warehouse or something.” Read the rest here.

So that is their reasoning? My husband and my cat are made up of water, so if you use that baseless garbage logic, they have the propensity to be worth much more than as carbon based?

Henry Kissinger said, ““Who controls the food supply controls the people; who controls the energy can control whole continents; who controls money can control the world.”

Is Bill Gates the water king of North America? It’s starting to quack like a duck. And his timing is impeccable.

The FALSE side of Abortion Economics

Economics. It seems like such a safe subject, right? Think of the television commercials that look at the ‘cause and effect’ of being Phil Shifley – they show how the most unforeseen outcome can be the answer to a scenario; but Occam’s razor is a principle stating that among competing hypotheses, the answer is the most obvious [most sense or path of least resistance]. Essentially, unless the math doesn’t jive, it’s conjecture. The math of this abortion equation does NOT jive….how can this have possibly been calculated when ‘cause and effect’ cannot be totally determined. Incidentally, cause and effect are philosophical, not statistical.

The abortion economic question is this: Was abortion the answer to lower criminal activity BECAUSE of their mother’s present economic and social status?

The author of ‘Freakonomics’ wrote: “The very factors that drove millions of American women to have an abortion also seemed to predict that their children, had they been born, would have led unhappy and possibly criminal lives…….Perhaps the most dramatic effect of legalized abortion, however, and one that would take years to reveal itself, was its impact on crime. In the early 1990s, just as the first cohort of children born after Roev. Wade was hitting its late teen years—the years during which young men enter their criminal prime—the rate of crime began to fall. What this cohort was missing, of course, were the children who stood the greatest chance of becoming criminals. And the crime rate continued to fall as an entire generation came of age minus the children whose mothers had not wanted to bring a child into the world. Legalized abortion led to less unwantedness; unwantedness leads to high crime; legalized abortion, therefore, led to less crime.”

Also know that the author commented that having a swimming pool in your back yard makes your child more likely to die than not having a pool. I would agree to that….and add that having a way to harm a child close at hand, whether it is a swimming pool or an abortion practitioner, to be a very BAD DECISION and can result in a child’s death.

SIDENOTE: Is Obamacare the new ‘Freakonomics’….ponder that one.

Of course I have a HUGE problem with this scenario of abortion killing would-be criminals and particularly with the author [a term I use here LOOSELY]…because if his so-called research is correct, then every third-world child would never live outside the womb because they will always be in poverty, malnourished and ill. But then I remember that this was taken care of through people like the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the like to curb who gets born in developing countries, simply because of the unborn child’s circumstances. Then I step back and look at how this has been developing since the birth of a woman that was so arrogant that she made herself judge and jury on who gets to live here in the U.S. – Margaret Sanger of Planned Parenthood.

Ah, cause and effect…it makes for interesting conversation but should NEVER determine the outcome of life and death for anyone that cannot testify on their own behalf.

 

Give me ministry or give me my computer.

I have written previously about where our money goes regarding selling abortion. There are lists and lists of companies and corporations to boycott and write letters to. But, there is something in just about everyone’s abode that funds abortion every time we buy one, upgrade it….it’s your computer. And it’s mine.

Bill & Melinda Gates of Microsoft pump millions of dollars from their foundation to fund abortion overseas and in the United States. Bill Gates father was once the head of Planned Parenthood and his mother headed up the United Way. At this time, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation believe that “Family planning is a cost-effective way to save the lives of women and children, and it empowers families to determine the optimal timing and spacing of births. And, that includes abortion.

So the question is this: how do I boycott my computer?

You don’t. I looked at site after site and they all said ‘never buy from them again’ to ‘throw it out’. If we did that, then we would have to turn off cable television, throw away cell phones, etc. What do we do? Thoughtfully consider what would give God the glory in this (or any) situation.

As I am writing this article using their hardware and software, I am giving the devil himself a black eye. What I do, I do in Jesus name always. I give glory to God for providing the tools I use to have a ministry on the internet to purposefully, even if one at a time, save the lives of unborn children. I consider the fact that everything comes full circle, including typing along on my laptop that was supported by two people that mean to destroy life by the millions. And to let you know what my affect has been on abortion on my two computers – I’ve had to replace the hard drives four times.

By the way, your Mac is compromised, too.