SCOTUS Not Impressed With Pseudo Proabort Free Speech Farce

Although, it warmed my heart to know that proaborts from Ohio traversed all the way to the Supreme Court, stood in freezing rain to get a ‘meh’ from even the liberal Justices. Just too hilarious for words…but I’ll try.
THIS is how stupid it is: Justice Anthony Kennedy also expressed doubts about the law. In one question that may prove to be pivotal in the case, he asked Farris what would happen if an unlicensed clinic wanted to put up a billboard that said only, in large letters, “Choose Life.” Would that message trigger the law’s notice requirement? Farris responded that the billboard would indeed have to disclose that the nonprofit does not provide medical services (FOR A CHOOSE LIFE SIGN????????) – a point with which Klein seemed to agree. Farris’ answer drew a sharp response from Kennedy. Requiring the inclusion of a 29-word notice on a billboard displaying a two-word message, Kennedy suggested, seems to impose an “undue burden” on the nonprofit’s speech “that should suffice to invalidate the statute.”

Every bit of this sideshow is clearly unconstitutional. Forcing anyone to go against their personal beliefs and conscience is Hitleresque, at the very least.
Justice Samuel Alito, on the other hand, was concerned that the law unfairly singles out anti-abortion facilities like crisis pregnancy centers while providing exemptions for other kinds of health-care providers. “If you have a law that’s neutral on its face” but then contains “a lot of crazy exemptions,” he asked, “isn’t it possible to infer intentional discrimination?” YES, it is intentional.
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg joined the fray. She asked Klein whether, if the state had enacted the law to address the problem of crisis pregnancy centers providing incomplete or inaccurate information. That again. Prolife pregnancy centers has never given ‘incomplete’ or wrong information to women. In fact just recently, ultrasound techs in abortion mills purposely will not show a complete image of her unborn child to ‘prove’ her child is truly a blob, see that here. That is reprehensible, that is LYING. Just because ol’ Ruth still believes life does not begin at conception does not mean she can push her abortion agenda on the rest of us. Get a CLUE.

Simply, this censorship law was passed to silence prolife centers and groups to sell more abortions. Pregnancy centers do not claim to be medical facilities, although some do have licensed technicians, nurses and physicians on the premises and/or on call. Abortion mills claim to be health centers when they CLEARLY take life, murder for money, and at times there is no physician present. In California, legislation has been passed to allow essentially anyone to perform abortion procedures. Read more about that here.

So, ultimately proaborts trying to censor prolife free speech backfired. And as well it should. Their pseudo science and twisted up logic was lost upon the Justices of the Supreme Court, and everyone else. Again.

Read the rest of the opinion here.

2016-07-21 10.46.41O

Pick me! Pick ME!

sebeliusnomination_hans9From the Topeka Capital-Journal:  Gov. Kathleen Sebelius completed Tuesday the first of two rounds of questioning by senators leading to her almost-certain confirmation as secretary of the federal health and human services agency…

The only vocal opposition to her nomination by President Barack Obama has been from anti-abortion groups who criticize the governor, a Roman Catholic, for supporting abortion rights. Catholic League President Bill Donohue recently called Sebelius an “enemy of the unborn,”…

Sen. Tom Coburn, an Oklahoma Republican and a physician, said he was disturbed by the possibility of the Obama administration forcing him to perform abortion procedures. Coburn is opposed to abortion. Sebelius said she supported policies granting doctors the freedom to make those decisions without government interference. Read the article here.

Sebelius said she supported policies granting doctors the freedom to make those decisions without government interference….That’s a grand statement, but when the Freedom of Choice Act is signed, it will overturn any promises she makes today regarding protecting medical professionals from tasks that would impede with their religious views or morality. 

The Obama administration announced its intent to rescind the Conscience Rule, but it’s seeking public comment by April 9 before making a final decision. President Obama has pledged to seek common ground on contentious “life” issues.

There is no common ground with any ‘life’ issues. Life is in God’s hands, not Obama’s…

And, Sebelius was not questioned about the Dr. Tiller the baby killer scandal and her connections to him, particularly his monetary contributions to her…..anyway, getting back on track…

From the Christian Medical and Dental Associations;  RE: the Conscience Rule – The conscience clause (rule) is a necessary regulation to preserve the exclusive patient to doctor relationship. Without it, the government will be able to effectively limit where patients can go for care. Further, no doctor should lose their job or be denied a promotion for following their conscience. The conscience clause is necessary to ensure physicians are not penalized for following the Hippocratic Oath and putting the health of their patients first. To better understand how the ‘rule’ affects our medical professionals that have a soul, view this video – http://www.cmda.org/media/Videos/ROC_Video_1.wmv.

Also, this video below features Dr. Tom Coburn (Oklahoma Senator, R.) on Fox News this past month regarding the rescinding of the Conscience Rule.

This isn’t just about medical professionals being fired, it’s about going to jail for standing up for LIFE.