#Prolife #Arkansas tells #40DaysForLife vigil they can’t have signs?

KEEPLIFELEGALI see…new rules? According to the Arkansas Democrat Gazette, after 8 successful, peaceful vigils since 2011, 40 Days for Life can’t have signs? And even if this was a statute for some years, why now? Even at Planned Parenthood, where 40 Days Fayetteville holds their vigil, said “the issue was between the state and the protesters, and that her group had no comment.”

The Highway Department has received a faxed letter of protest from a legal firm representing the group, a spokesman confirmed Thursday. The letter alleges that the state is violating the group’s First Amendment rights to free speech.

A letter from the Thomas More Society, who represents the national40 Days for LIFE 40 Days vigils, said: “We respectfully maintain that her directives — attempting to prohibit First Amendment activity on public property, including sidewalks along a state highway — were overly broad and, if enforced, they would be a clear violation of our client’s First Amendment rights.”

40 Days for Life in Fayetteville is the only 40 Days vigil in Arkansas and has seen “better-than-usual participation”, according to Sheena Archambault, coordinator of the 40 Days for Life Campaign.  Planned Parenthood of Fayetteville does offer abortion ‘services’ and contraception [abortifacients].

KEEPLIFELEGALWhat is interesting is that Planned Parenthood ‘has no opinion’ and seem undeterred while the state of Arkansas is pushing an unconstitutional ordinance on people who are peacefully protesting. Does anyone really know WHO made the complaint about the signs? Planned Parenthood of Fayetteville may not have a public ‘opinion’, but PP has never been….truthful.

Arkansas calls itself a “prolife state” but now shows that they may not be as prolife as the new Governor, Asa Hutchinson, purports to be.

Governor Hutchinson, what is your opinion of this obvious unconstitutional sudden ‘ban’ on signs…or is this a targeted attempt to keep the reality of unborn child killing a secret in The Natural State?

KeepLifeLegal is a supporter of 40 Days for LIFE.

40 Days Fall 2012

The Definition of Hypocrisy in a Death Roe World

In the ‘here we go again’ file, hypocrisy is quite one sided, according to the Abortion Agenda. They see rights for a born female person while executing the unborn [male AND female] and usurping men’s rights; the rights of ALL the people STOPPED in 1973. However, the South has said NO to abortion and the so-called rights it perceives.


[hi-pok-ruh-see]  noun, plural hy·poc·ri·sies. [here for ref]

1. a pretense of having a virtuous character, moral or religious beliefs or principles, etc., that one does not really possess.
2. a pretense of having some desirable or publicly approved attitude.

3. an act or instance of hypocrisy.

Legal experts say the legislation is raising a fundamental question: At what point is access to abortion so limited that it violates the right to the procedure granted by the United States Supreme Court in 1973 in Roe v. Wade?” Read the rest here.

Before 1973, abortion was bad enough – but the states governed it the way they saw fit, as the TENTH AMENDMENT says it should. We vote for state legislators, state senators and governors to protect the right for the state to be governed by it’s people: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.” Death Roe took rights away from everyone except women. THAT is hypocrisy. 

The so-called right to abortion and so-called war on women took other rights away that the Constitution protected, which leads one to wonder why everyone else is being bullied to placate a certain sect of people to murder. Women are meant to be life bearers, not murderers.

Protecting a woman’s right to abortion murders a person that HAD Constitutional rights; protecting a woman’s right to abortion takes away the parental and Constitutional rights of the father and family…THAT is hypocrisy.

Recently, a Michigan woman ‘intentionally suffocated her newborn daughter in an attempt to conceal her pregnancy’. She is free on a $5,000 bond. Everyone is up in arms because she murdered her baby  just a few minutes after she was born…and just before she was born, it was legal to murder her through abortion because of Roe. THAT is hypocrisy. 

In Louisiana, ‘House Bill 305prohibits abortion providers and their affiliates from speaking in public or charter schools on health issues. Ellie Schilling, a lawyer who advises abortion clinics in Louisiana, said the proposed law would likely lose a constitutional battle in court because it limits free speech and violations the equal protection clause in the 14thamendment by singling out those with a particular viewpoint. AGAIN, free speech is only free for…the ABORTION AGENDA & PLANNED PARENTHOOD? And the Bible has been BANISHED????? I’d say THAT is hypocrisy. 

But *Jesus said, “v29 Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! Because you build the tombs of the prophets and adorn the monuments of the righteous, v30 and say, ‘If we had lived in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets’.” Yes, Jesus said THAT is hypocrisy.

*Matthew 23:29-30