Is Ohio Getting in the #DeathPanel business?

The short answer is YES. And so is the long answer from a so-called prolife State Senator:

“The bill, sponsored by Sen. Peggy Lehner, R-Kettering, would create the Medical Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST), giving instruction on whether a patient wants to be hospitalized, resuscitated or given comfort care.” ~ Columbus Dispatch

But the real answer is this:Starting Jan. 1 the federal government will pay doctors who speak with Medicare patients about end-of-life care. The recent announcement by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services impacts about 50 million beneficiaries of the government’s health-care program for the elderly and disabled.” ~ Columbus Dispatch

And, interestingly: “The decision has not had the backlash as a similar proposal included in President Barack Obama’s health-care overhaul several years ago. It was subsequently stripped from the Affordable Care Act after complaints it would create ‘death panels‘.” ~ Columbus Dispatch

Click here to see Cincinnati Right to Life’s information regarding the Death Panel Bill. Too much to post, here but well worth the read.

State Senator Peggy Lehner has once again shown that she is not prolife and can’t be trusted. She said this bill is not about assisted suicide, much like how medical marijuana doesn’t open the door to recreational weed? This bill swings the door out widely for death panels. Lehner lies. She recently said that ‘Planned Parenthood does some good‘ while calling herself a prolifer, see the video below and go here [at minute 146]. LIES. Over and over again she proves she has an agenda to keep her job rather than doing what she was elected to do: PROTECT ALL LIFE. Lehner made a nice showing at the Martin Haskell hearing last week, I suppose her stern, apathetic look toward a deliberate criminal would look ‘prolife’,? REALLY?

Peggy, we are watching.

EXPOSING THE ABORTION AGENDA FROM THE PULPIT, ON THE SIDEWALK, THE MEDIA & IN THE STATEHOUSE. KeepLifeLegal advocates for unborn life on the sidewalks of abortion facilities, the steps of the Statehouse, and the Church with prayer, community outreach, and real LIFE supporting options. 


How we are indeed offended! Of everything! People hold higher regard for animals than for humans, born or unborn. They are offended by the mere mention of unborn babies dying EVERY DAY from abortion but pick up stray diseased animals off the street….you know, rescue them. And then we sing the praises of people that use the government to get your money to fund the abortion agenda!

OFFENDED yet? Well, did you know that tax payers are the largest DONORS to Planned Parenthood? That’s right…you and me. We pay to kill unborn babies regardless if our morality, conscience or if our religious freedom has been dumped on. I wonder if there’s a mandate for that…

KEEPLIFELEGALI jumped into the fray of a comment strand that was toward a man that euthanized an animal incorrectly and was caught on smart phone video. Now, while that is bad and as children of God we are called to be great stewards of His creation, this is still an animal that is being held in higher regard than all of the unborn babies that died a heinous death the exact same day.

Also in the news recently, “Aborted human fetuses are being shipped from British Columbia to the United States, where they are incinerated to provide electricity for Oregon residents“. Read the story here.

What’s interesting is that no one seems to be a bit offended that aborted baby remains are incinerated, only that they were used for fuel. Every week we see the ‘death truck’ come to get red biohazard tubs filled with dead children and no one is offended??  KEEPLIFELEGAL

IF YOU ARE OFFENDED THEN SHOW UP ON THE SIDEWALK. Until then, this is only a news story that you will forget by dinner time..


Life Worthy?

Prochoice/proaborts conclude that women know if the baby they’re carrying is ‘life worthy’. Life worthiness is an opinion, not a scientific fact…because if it were, would ANYONE be worthy enough to be born?

There are the usual abortion excuses to kill at least 25% of unborn babies – disability, economic, rape, selfishness – but what would happen if we broadened the abortion excuses spectrum to include what MIGHT happen?

(((This is where you need a crystal ball and ouija board)))

One day these prochoicers will eventually want to be parents – then what exactly will be their criteria? We already know they won’t have children that ALREADY have disability or ALREADY have economic/socioeconomic woes or their current selfishness toward life. When their ‘wanted’ child turns 5 years old and gets cancer, should she/he have aborted JUST IN CASE she would have gotten cancer? If her ‘wanted’ child grows up and becomes a drug addict, would it have been better that the child been aborted JUST IN CASE he/she became an addict?

Will they look at them, at their infirmity, and say their child should have been aborted?

Prochoicers, no matter how smart they think they are, cannot predict what may happen to them or their children. Life does happen every day to everyone.

The excuse of ‘a better life’ is one of a very broad spectrum; and be aware that the same mindset is being used with our elderly. Is there still some ‘usefulness’ to keep them alive?

Prochoice logic says quite clear that since we will all eventually get sick and die, we should have never been born so that we would not be a burden to them or ourselves.

v16 These six things the Lord hates,
Yes, seven are an abomination to Him:
v17 A proud look, a lying tongue,
Hands that shed innocent blood,
v18 A heart that devises wicked plans,
Feet that are swift in running to evil,
v19 A false witness who speaks lies,
And one who sows discord among brethren. [Proverbs 6:16:19]

If we use their prochoice logic, then how could anyone be born or allowed to live?  Prochoice logic says ‘wanted’, abortion says DEATH. How is that logical? Shedding innocent blood is not just an option, it’s encouraged.

Then, how can life worthiness be determined by abortion minded men and women if they believe death to be the best option?

Prochoice is NOT logical. It’s deadly.

Living on LIFE Support

When LIFE Support is administered, it is typically because the patient is in grave danger and cannot speak for themselves to tell medical persons what is wrong or what happened. Medical persons [doctors, nurses, EMT’s, etc] rely on instinct, medical training and what loved ones or good Samaritans have shared with them. In other words, a person with no voice has life saving measures administered to SAVE their life, not take it; the patient relies on others to save their life.

Think of it this way: You and your family go swimming. For whatever reason you cannot stay afloat and begin to drown…is it your instinct to try and float so you can live OR tell others not to help you and allow your to drown? Watch For Children

Or this way: If your child suddenly started to bolt out into oncoming traffic, would you want the nearest person to pull him/her to safety OR would you rather that person question whether or not the child is worth saving?

When life is in danger, life support is TO support life not take it; LIFE Support on the sidewalk is TO support and defend unborn life.

Death TruckMost often when an unborn child goes into the abortion facility, they don’t come out. Their life has been decided to be unimportant, chosen for execution rather than a life worth supporting.

Abortion – ending LIFE support of an unborn baby – doesn’t prevent the woman from being a parent.

LIFE Support on the sidewalk is an initiative to present life supporting options for a person – the unborn child – that cannot speak for themselves. LIFE support is meant to support the life of the infirm, not the caregiver or parent or family.

Support LIFE, speak LIFE.

v15 “See, I have set before you today life and good, death and evil, v16 in that I command you today to love the Lord your God, to walk in His ways, and to keep His commandments, His statutes, and His judgments, that you may live and multiply; and the Lord your God will bless you in the land which you go to possess.” Deut 30:15-16]

The Myth of Abortion Rights by an abortion rights guy, part 4 of 10.

 4. “Even first-trimester fetuses can feel pain.”

He said False. “Fetal nerve cells can react to trauma, but pain reception requires a neocortex–which is not formed until early in the third trimester.”

MYTH BUSTED: This excuse to abort unborn children that might not feel pain is ludicrous to INSANE. The abortion rights guy says ‘fetal nerve cells can REACT to trauma…’ – react, he says. Reacting to a trauma is knowing that the trauma rendered is or will be PAINFUL. Going on to his next comment about the neocortex, says, “[The neocortex] is involved in higher functions such as sensory perception, generation of motor commands, spatial reasoning, conscious thought, and in humans, language.” Not one word was said about pain. Not one.

Essentially, the pro-aborts say that unborn babies react with a reflex not actual pain to the intrusion of the abortion procedure. This is perhaps one of the biggest lies that pro-aborts and pro-choicers lean on for keeping and expanding abortion rights for ‘women’. Reacting to a trauma is knowing that the trauma rendered will be PAINFUL. Considering that the brain isn’t set up for feeling pain that young but has the capacity to react to an impending painful scenario deepens the mindset of KNOWING that pain may ensue, even in the first trimester.

Also consider this: Hereditary Sensory and Autonomic Neuropathy* (HSAN) or Hereditary Sensory Neuropathy (HSN) is a condition used to describe any of the types of this disease(s) which inhibit sensation [see below]. About 1 in 25,000 has this issue of not being able to feel PAIN. Then, would the abortions rights guy be okay with killing these folks because of their inability to feel the pain of being killed?

Or, imagine that Grandma is lying in hospice, in a coma, maybe even brain-dead in the physician’s opinion. Can Grandma feel pain if she were euthanized? According to the abortion rights guy, if that person has a neocortex, yes she can. And since Grandma is post 20 weeks gestation, it would be considered that she would in fact feel PAIN.

So the summary is this: If someone, born or unborn, cannot feel pain, is it okay to murder them through abortion or euthanasia? This is the dividing line between so-called women’s rights and the rights of the not yet born. Our desensitation of human life and liberty started well before 1973 when poor women wanted what rich women had – the money and means to abort their unborn children conceived in either an unnatural manner, extra-marital, interracial, or class standing issues.

Once again, and probably for EVER since pro-aborts keep leaning on the pain switch, watch ‘Silent Scream’. It’ll change your life.


*HSAN & HSN:  Type 1, Common, Type 2, Congenital sensory neuropathy, Type 3, Familial dysautonomia, Type 4, Congenital insensitivity to pain with anhidrosis, Type 5, Congenital insensitivity to pain with partial anhidrosis.