Incremental Prolife Law Explained

Totally get it. Abortion should be abolished, no question. But that is not how the law works because the law is BROKEN. We know this. But abolitionists holding their breath until they get what they want is not saving one life.

v6 I planted, Apollos watered, but God gave the increase.
v7 So then neither he who plants is anything, nor he who waters, but God who gives the increase.
v8 Now he who plants and he who waters are one, and each one will receive his own reward according to his own labor. [1Cor 3:6-8]

THAT is incrementalism explained. THAT is Bible.

Did you know it takes, on average, about a dozen times to hear the Gospel to finally come to the saving knowledge of Jesus Christ? You know, getting saved? Because God works through people like you and me. God has always worked with people because of the Fall: “Let every soul be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and the authorities that exist are appointed by God.” [Romans 13:1]

If you really think Roe and abortion will magically disappear, you’ll be waiting until the Rapture because:

*People still steal even though it’s illegal
*People still buy/sell drugs even though it’s illegal
*People still scam even though it’s illegal
*People still murder – even though it’s illegal

*And women will still try to abort their unborn children when it becomes illegal.

The list is endless. An abolitionist’s purpose is not supposed to be wagging a finger at other activists, but rather furthering the Gospel to MAKE ABORTION UNTHINKABLE. And here’s why…

The abortion pill is being sold over the internet ALL THE TIME. Moms are taking it upon themselves to ‘self care’ at home because incrementalism has taken abortion mills off every corner. These women need the Gospel, these women need Mercy and Grace. THEY NEED CORRECT INFORMATION and a real options.

Incrementalism has LITERALLY saved millions of lives since abortion has been legal. MILLIONS. Absolutely NO ONE can deny that. And it is important to note that the only way to repeal Roe, and in every state (there’s that pesky 10th Amendment, some states have trigger laws in place now) is to be vigilant, support legislation, and be on the sidewalk where every person going into a kill mill will hear about Jesus and His Love for them, and the family residing within them.

But here is my last thought about all of this: Some abolitionists are taking public pot shots in a passive/aggressive manner at good people doing great things, and it is abysmal. It causes public division that makes all of us look like we are running with scissors AT EACH OTHER while proaborts watch the sideshow.

HOWEVER there are bad prolifers. A lot of them. We will continue to expose them.

And there you have it. I take NO glory in taking pot shots at others because it does NOT please God. Please consider the same. Take the same voracity at proaborts and deathscorts and their handlers rather than the others who are on your side of the sidewalk.

You can be prolife AND anti-abortion at the same time. True story.

Debate Analysis: Gregg Cunningham vs. T. Russell Hunter on “Pro-Life Incrementalism vs. Abolitionist Immediatism”

Excellent analysis. This constant fight against each other has to stop; prolifers have been on the front lines for over 40 years and will be until Roe is repealed. Anyone who is a shamer of prolifers who daily deal with the heat, rain, snow, and abuse on the sidewalk should look inward to find out why their need to bully is more prevalent and important than saving lives, even if it’s just one at a time, whether at the statehouse or a common sidewalk. We also have to remember to make abortion UNTHINKABLE, not just illegal. To change the heart of proaborts, pre-abortive women and men takes patience and love and TRUTH, consistently. ~ KeepLifeLegal

J.W. Wartick - Reconstructing Faith

I do not take credit for this image and use it under fair use. I do not take credit for this image and use it under fair use.

I recently took the time to watch through a debate on pro-life method between Gregg Cunningham and T. Russell Hunter. I summarized the debate here, along with a brief introduction of what was seen to be at issue. Essentially, Cunningham endorses the position that we should pass laws to limit abortion as much as possible now while working towards the ultimate goal of ending all abortion, whereas Hunter argues that we must work only for legislation that will “abolish” all abortions now.

Cutting Off Branches vs. Save Babies Now?

T. Russell Hunter continually made the same error: reducing everything down to an either-or when it could just as easily be both-and. His analogy of the tree was used throughout the talk. Abortion is the tree, he argued, and we must cut the tree down rather than…

View original post 1,376 more words