I’m sure you’ve noticed we have expanded from prolife news and commentary to the lockdown of free speech and religious freedom by big tech, fraudulent elections, blatant vax cover-ups, and the new fake government that makes it all happen. In real time.
We moved into the ‘The Public Prolifer’ phase truly because we are public, literally. We have been on the public right-of-way since 2011.
We are also podcasting again; we took a four year sabbatical [shame on ME] from podcasting. I think a lot of us took a four year vacation thinking we had eight. Again, shame on us for assuming that democracy worked within a republic that was supposed to protect it and the Constitution. Shame on ME.
Actually, the same thing kept us pretty busy during the Obama years. Yet an Obama third term is here to keep things interesting, outing lying lazy republicans and their handlers.
So, here we go again! Onto another twelve years and BEYOND! Because a changed mind is a terrible thing to waste.
WORDS MATTER. There is a war of the words plopping right onto your lap. This upcoming election is twisting words into screaming emotions. Some can’t sleep at night with worry. Some are plotting. Some are Red Bulling it to the point of emotional break. We are at WAR.
Facebook, et al, is murdering free speech, we all know that. But now out loud actively shutting down particular hashtags that reflect anything that would imply something other than far left-wing rhetoric? ALL social media outlets are forcing you to bend to their chosen words to take this election from President Trump, simply by twisting words and doctrine to suit their narrative.
None of this is a coincidence even though Facebook says it is “taking more steps to encourage voting, minimize misinformation and reduce the likelihood of post-election civil unrest.” This thing initiated by Zuck is like an elementary primer of Gaslighting 101. So stinking obvious, as if we’re too stupid to see it. And Zuck’s doing this to get you too battle weary to care anymore.
Just to be clear: Anything decent, moral, conservative, Christian, the color red, is ‘misinformation’. Zuck goes on to say, “This election is not going to be business as usual. We all have a responsibility to protect our democracy.” Considering Zuck isn’t shutting down real ‘misinformation’, we call that a one-sided monopoly.
So let’s put this in prolife terms because as all prolifers know, this war on words has been going on for DECADES. And we see through it every time: Fetus. Choice. Blob of cells. Not a baby yet. Misogyny. All words to make you doubt the humanity of unborn human people. We deal with it, we oppose it, we fight it, literally every day since 1973. We are not unaware of proaborts intent to discredit and make you doubt everything you believe in.
“But we have this treasure in earthen vessels, that the excellence of the power may be of God and not of us. We are hard-pressed on every side, yet not crushed; we are perplexed, but not in despair; persecuted, but not forsaken; struck down, but not destroyed,” [2Cor4:7-11].
But we’re onto ’em. This has been going on for a long time, since the ’08 and ’12 election. Zuck has tried too hard to manipulate all of us to get a left-wing Democrat in office, but even his billions can’t stop what God has started [Acts 5:38-39].
We are battle weary and political fatigue feels like it’s going to swamp us. This war on words is not new. But with anti-social media, it’s become an Olympic event, in your face 24/7, all to get you to hate yourself enough to vote how Zuck and mainstream media wants you to. As we’ve mentioned in previous posts, we are being shadow banned on Facebook. It’s part of the battle. We know this.
This could be the civil war Zuck and others have been begging for.
Read the Book of Acts and get ready because if this sways Zuck’s way, all we’ll have is the few things the Apostles had to keep spreading the Gospel in a social and economic tyranny of epic proportions.
Facebook. Zuck is an anti-Constitution billionaire socialist. And just in time for the election of the millennium he makes new ‘terms‘. Interesting timing.
Like little sheep we abide by their so-called ‘standards’ or banished to the gulag in the outer reaches of the graynet. And we do it. No real pushback, just bowing to the god Zuck. We have made Facebook an idol, a type of god, that Zuck wants you to worship and never question. Zuck wants you to forego your Constitutional freedoms and Christianity.
Imagine not agreeing to FB’s terms of ‘service’. Imagine not buying ads or buying from their ads or ‘services’. Imagine a Facebook BLACKOUT to show OUR ‘terms’ of service. We are being groomed to sacrifice our freedom as Americans with something as useless and non-essential as Facebook.
As Christians, we have thrown our beliefs on the altar of Zuck, much like how the Ammonites put babies to be sacrificed on the altar of Molech.
As conservatives, we skirt the ‘terms of service’ (service…what a joke) to stay out of the outer reaches of the gulag. It’s almost a rite of passage to get that banishment from the Facebook overlords.
As prolifers, we are shadowbanned and shut down while FB allows deathscorts to bully and intimidate and terrorize true peaceful protesters. They use filthy hate mongering rhetoric, always doxing prolifers, gaslighting truth, all with the permission of Zuck.
But what do we sacrifice to stay in Zuck’s good graces? And never mind about our own sensibilities. All we do is tell the truth and get splayed on the Facebook Altar of Sacrifice. What is the cost? Our voices and opinions are shut down to oblige the many minions of Zuck who seem to be offended with anything decent and good and Godly.
Facebook HATES Christians and God. Facebook HATES Republicans and Conservatives. Facebook HATES President Trump.
Facebook LOVES domestic terrorists. They placate and bow down BLM and Antifa. They court fake ‘peaceful protesting’ that looks like terrorism and rioting.
All at the cost of your First Amendment Rights as Americans.
Then the question is WHY isn’t anyone really doing anything about this? Facebook has been altering YOUR THINKING for Democrat outcomes for years. They have paid to play to get the candidate Zuck thinks YOU should have that will run our country right in to the ground.
But I could opine about the irony of it all. Wealthy socialists tell us how wrong we are but never give up a dime to help anyone in real need or distribute their wealth like they want to force you to do. Look at the aftermath of Hurricane Laura, has Zuck or Bezos or Gates or BLM or Antifa shown up to tangibly help one person? AT ALL?
It’s time to tear down the high places, the altar of Baal…I mean, Facebook.
A POLITICAL CONVERSATION – by Jeremiah Johnson Ministries
Is it unreasonable to ask Christians to simply vote for the candidate they feel best represents biblical values?
I openly confess that I have NEVER understood the wars surrounding politics. Here is my process:
Every election year, I blot out Democrat or Republican and I also blot out the candidates names. I then check whatever boxes best represent biblical values.
✅ Pro Life ✅ Pro Israel ✅ Pro Religious Liberty
And on and on…
The candidate and party that has the most checked boxes is who I vote for. Period. White, black, hispanic, male, female, etc. If any Democrat or any other party had the most checked boxes, I would vote for them in a heartbeat. Period.
For example, in the 2016 Florida Primaries, I voted for Tedd Cruz over Donald Trump. Why? Because I believed he more rightly represented biblical values.
In November when the election became Donald Trump versus Hillary Clinton, I again, blotted out the political parties and names and simply checked the boxes. I then had no other option but to vote for Trump.
When Christians start bashing Joe Biden or Donald Trump for their demeanor, competency, decisions etc, I personally do not understand. Put the men and political parties aside and just check boxes based off biblical values. Why is this so hard?
I look at the 2020 election and don’t even begin to understand what the debate is among Christians as to who to vote for. Without tearing down either man, can we just look at the Bible to determine our vote? Can someone help me understand what I’m missing?
LOVE IT when proaborts makes our lives easier. First, they try to silence us…NOPE. Second, they try to get us arrested exercising our FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS on the public right-of-way….NOPE. Third, and my personal favorite, is when proaborts LIE OUT LOUD to the police and 911 operators…NOPE. You all just got found out, and it’ll cost ya.
“Unbeknownst to Thames, a Northland employee and the security guard called 911 and made a false claim that Thames was threatening to bomb the Northland facility………Based solely on the absurd and false accusation of the security guard, the police arrested Thames, who then spent 49 hours in the City jail until a detective finally released her after reading the report and concluding, “I do not see a direct threat where Kimberly threatened to bomb the clinic.”
The Judge’s ruling continued: “Based on this record, there is a genuine issue of material fact as to whether Officers Gatti and Sergeant Brooks arrested Thames for her prolife activity, and not because she made a ‘true threat’. Significantly, Defendants failed to evacuate the abortion clinic or make any meaningful attempt to locate a bomb……Just as with Thames’ First Amendment retaliatory arrest claim, the law was clearly established that the police could not arrest a peaceful speaker engaged in protected speech on a public sidewalk…….Accordingly, the arresting officers are not entitled to qualified immunity on Thames’ equal protection claim.”
“The judge’s ruling is significant in at least two respects. First, our client’s meritorious case is now heading to a jury, which will allow us to seek significant monetary damages for the pain and suffering these officers inflicted. And second, the judge’s ruling establishes important legal precedent for future pro-life cases. Too often these cases are dismissed because the court finds that the arresting officers are entitled to qualified immunity. Here, to deny the officers this defense, the judge had to conclude that the officers are liable for violating clearly established rights of which a reasonable person would have known, which he did, thereby sending the case to a jury.” (American Freedom Law Center)